Minister for Foreign
Affairs
House of Representatives,
Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600
31st March 2014
Dear Minister
Citipointe has finally
agreed to relinquish control of Rosa and Chita. Hopefully, the process of
re-integration will be handled along the lines I suggested in my letter of 28th
March.
Neither Citipointe nor
any other NGO should be allowed to remove children under the circumstances that prevailed in 2008.
Might I suggest that:
(1) All NGOs in receipt
of AusAID approved tax-deductible funds provide the Australian embassy with
copies of the MOUs they enter into with the Cambodian government.
(2) Copies of these MOUs,
in Khmer, be provided to the parents or close relatives of families whose
children have been removed by NGOs.
(3) Copies of these MOUs,
in Khmer, be provided to the Village and Commune Chiefs of the children
removed, along with the reasons for the removal.
 |
| Grandma Vanna with freshly bathed Kevin |
(4) Children placed in
the care of Australian NGOs, and their parents or close relatives, have their
rights and responsibilities in relation to such MOUs explained to them in language
they understand.
(5) Removed children and
their parents/relatives be provided with a written document (in Khmer) in which
their rights and responsibilities are outlined – particularly in relation to
what the parents must do if they wish to have their children returned to their
care.
(6) Removed children and their
parents be provided with a toll-free phone number within the Australian embassy to call if they
believe that their rights are being breached in any way by the NGO into whose
care the children have been entrusted.
(7) Children and their
parents or relatives have explained to them that their complaints will be dealt
with impartially and that they need not fear retribution from the NGO.
 |
| Chhork, Srey Ka, Poppy and one of the family dogs |
Had such a system been in
place five years ago, Chanti and Chhork could have lodged a complaint with the
Australian Embassy in Nov 2008. With just a few questions the Australian
Embassy would have discovered that:
(a) The 31st
July 2008 ‘contract’ Pastor Leigh Ramsey tricked Chanti into signing was not a
legal document; that Pastor Ramsey had lied when she told Chanti that the
‘contract’ gave the church the right to detain Rosa and Chita until they were 18.
(b) Citipointe had not
entered into an MOU with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that gave the church
the legal right to remove Rosa and Chita in July 2008.
(c) Citipointe’s lawyer
and the police had threated to put both Chanti and Chhork in jail if they again
attempted to ‘kidnap’ their daughters from the ‘SHE Rescue Home’.
 |
| Chanti talking on her mobile phone and Kevin |
(d) Rosa and Chita, the
daughters of Buddhist parents, were being forced by Citipointe to go to a
Christian church, in breach of AusAID guidelines vis a vis proselytizing.
(e) Chanti’s visitation
rights to her daughters in 2008 were tied to her attending church also.
(f) Citipointe had
limited Chanti and Chhork’s visiting rights to their daughters to a total of 24
hours each year – these visits to be supervised by church staff at all times.
There is much more that the
Australian embassy would have discovered in Nov 2008 but the above would have,
should have, set alarm bells ringing. If Chanti and Chhork’s allegations were
revealed to be true the Australian Embassy would have been able to let
Citipointe know, in no uncertain terms, that the church was in breach of AusAID
rules and the ACFID Code of Conduct.
 |
| Chhork, Srey Ka and James |
Had such due diligence
been applied in 2008, five years of angst for Chanti, Chhork, Rosa and Chita could
have been avoided. Had such basic guidelines been in place in 2008 Citipointe
would have had to think twice before acting as it did in relation to Rosa and
Chita’s removal and indoctrination and the threats of jail leveled at Chanti
and Chhork. The same applies to other Australian based NGOs in receipt of
AusAID approved tax-deductible funds engaged in proselytizing, the removal of
children from their materially poor families and the use of these children to
raise money through sponsorships and donations.
With no independent
assessment or monitoring of the activities of NGOs in Cambodia all manner of
human rights abuses are possible. There are many which take advantage of this
fact to (a) proselytize and (b) exploit Cambodian poverty for their own
financial gain.
 |
| Kevin |
The filmic evidence I
have suggests that in Nov 2008 there was not one girl resident in the ‘SHE
Rescue Home’ who was a ‘victim of human trafficking’; that all of the girls in
the Home were from poor families whose parent (or parents) had been induced, as
Chanti had been, into placing their thumb prints on a phony ‘contract’ and then
told that they had signed away their daughters until they were 18 years old.
How many of these parents, poor and powerless, with no knowledge of their legal
rights, with no-one such as myself to advocate on their behalf, believe to this
day that they have lost their daughters until they are 18? How many of these
bereaved parents know that Citipointe church is presenting their daughters to
potential sponsors and donors as ‘victims of human trafficking’ and reaping substantial
financial rewards in the process?
 |
Rosa and Chita's mum and dad with (from left) Kevin, James, baby Poppy and Srey Ka
|
The exploitation of
Cambodian poverty by Australian-based NGOs should come to an end but this will
not happen unless or until AusAID rules are respected, the ACFID Code of
Conduct is adhered to and the recipients of aid are provided with the
mechanisms whereby they can complaint about any human rights abuses they may
suffer at the hands of NGOs.
best wishes
James Ricketson
 |
Rosa and Chita's dad - a non-drinking, no-smoking, non-gambling gentle man who adores his children and whose heart has been broken by the loss of his two eldest daughters.
|
 |
Rosa and Chita's healthy and very happy youngest sister, Poppy
|
 |
Rosa and Chita's sister, Srey Ka, whom they only get to see rarely during visits supervised by church personnel
|
No comments:
Post a Comment