The
Hon Tony Burke MP
Minister
for the Arts
PO
Box 156 Roselands
NSW 2196 2nd
July 2013
Dear
Minister
In May 2012 the Screen Australia
Board, on the recommendation of Chief Executive Dr Ruth Harley, instituted a
ban on myself based on the proposition that I had, in certain correspondence,
intimidated and placed at risk members of Screen Australia staff. This allegation
has damaged my reputation and the ban has made it very difficult for me to
pursue the career I have been engaged in for the past 40 years.
For more than a year now I have
been asking Dr Harley, the Screen Australia Board and Caroline Fulton (Director, Screen Industry Section, Creative Sector
Development Branch, Office for the Arts) to identify one paragraph, one
sentence or even one phrase in my correspondence that bear witness to my having
intimidated and placed at risk members of Screen Australia staff. They refuse
to do so. I have tried to acquire evidence of my alleged crimes through FOI
legislation and the Commonwealth Ombudsman to insist that Screen Australia
provide me with evidence, to no avail.
My first question for you
Minister is this:
Whom can
I ask, other than yourself, to be provided with evidence of the crimes of which
I have been charged and found guilty?
My second question:
Am I
entitled, as a banned filmmaker, to be provided with evidence that I am guilty
as charged?
Please, Minister, do not hand
this letter to an Arts Ministry spin doctor who will ‘note’ its contents and
ignore my questions – each of which requires but a monosyllabic answer.
If I have intimidated or placed
at risk any member of Screen Australia staff, I deserve to be banned and to be
publicly humiliated. Please insist, Minister, that the Board either make public
the evidence upon which their banning of me is based, or lift the ban such that
my reputation can be restored and I am able to continue my work as an
independent filmmaker without the albatross of the Screen Australia ban hanging
around my neck.
If the Chief Executive of Screen
Australia and its Board are under no obligation to provide evidence in support
of the banning of a filmmaker, what other decisions do they make that are not
subject to the ideals of transparency and accountability that should apply in
the administration of a tax-payer funded organization such as Screen Australia.
The enclosed letter to the Screen
Australia Board, dated 21st. June, speaks for itself.
best wishes
James Ricketson
No comments:
Post a Comment