HOW TO SCAM ‘ICARE’ AND BECOME A MILLIONAIRE - letter to John Robertson, Chair, care Board

James Ricketson

58 Braidwood Road

Goulburn 2580

jamesricketson@gmail.com

0488543555

John Robertson

Chair

icare Board

Locked Bag 2099

 North Ryde BC 

NSW 1670                                                                                              17^th October 2025

 

Dear Mr. Robertson

 

HOW TO SCAM  ‘ICARE’ AND BECOME A MILLIONAIRE

 

(1)   Get a job for a month

(2)   Accuse your employer of bullying

(3)   Find a psychiatrist prepared to declare that this month of bullying has traumatised you so badly that you will never be able to work again

(4)   Sue your employer and icare

(5)   Receive a ‘pension’ for life, paid to you by icare – millions of dollars.

 

You do not need to provide any evidence of ‘bullying’ – the allegation alone will suffice. You do not need to actually meet the psychiatrist in person. One conversation hour long conversation on the telephone is enough. Oh, and icare will provide you with $200 a week to feed you ‘comfort dog’? $10,000 a year.

 

The full story is a little more complicated, of course, as you know all too well Mr. Robertson. Or you shouldknow, given that this scam has been known to icare for between three and five years and well-documented by myself over the past three years in the many letters I have sent to icare.

 

This scam is going to cost icare well over $2 million and perhaps considerably more if C M, the perpetrator of the scam, lives to a ripe old age.

 

Three successive CEOs of icare (including Geniere Aplin), have been aware of the scam but have done nothing to stop it.

 

Why?

 

Incompetence?   

 

If so, an admission on the part of senior icare executives, in 2025,  that the workers compensation insurer has been scammed over a period of five years would expose them to ridicule.

 

Does their incompetence extend to other matters within icare that involve millions of dollars? If so, are they fit for purpose? 

 

If what I hear on the usually reliable icare grapevine is accurate, C M is now, in October 2025, trying to extract yet more money from icare? Is this so? Will icare accede to yet another C M demand and write him another cheque?

 

Is icare’s failure to stop Ms’ scam motivated by senior management’s hope that it will not become public knowledge and result in significant loss of face?

 

As Captain of the good ship icare, it is up to you to end this scam and, at the very least, recompense the innocent employer for the monies she has had to pay icare, and stop paying this serial scammer compensation he is not entitled to and that icare knows he is not entitled to.

 

The full facts of five year long administrative farce can be found in the many letters I have written to icare over the last few years – most of which are published on my blog, which can be found at:

 

http://jamesricketson.blogspot.com

 

Yours sincerely

 

         James Ricketson 

to Sophie Cotsis, Minister for Industrial Relations Minister for Work Health and Safety

                                                             James Ricketson

58 Braidwood Road

Goulburn 2580

jamesricketson@gmail,.com

0488543555

 

The Hon. Sophie Cotsis,

Minister for Industrial Relations

Minister for Work Health and Safety

GPO Box 5341 

Sydney NSW 2001

 

15^th. October 2015

 

Dear Ms Costis

 

I am writing to you in relation to an undated letter/email you sent to Hon Michael Daley MP Attorney General in which you mentioned my name.

 

Your message for the Attorney General is your response, as Minister (10 months down the track) to letters I sent to him on 18^th. December 2024 and 20^th. January. (see below) 

 

In these letters I drew his attention to Ms. L’s battle with icare, the Personal Injuries Commission and C M and provided him (and hence, yourself) with the web address at which all the facts of this case can be found. 

 

You have clearly not bothered to appraise yourself of the facts or, perhaps, have chosen to ignore them and hope that your letter to the Attorney General – an exercise in spin-doctoring – will provide him with a plausible ‘Get-Out-of- Jail Free’ card if this matter ever becomes a political embarrassment for the Minns government.

 

Your use of the expressions ‘I understand’ and ‘I am advised’ (classic politician weasel words) suggest that you are also providing yourself with a ‘Get-Out-of- Jail Free’ card: “If I had known the full facts of the matter, of course I would have acted...etc.”

 

If you did not know the full facts when you wrote to the Attorney General, you were not doing your job, and you can be added to the list of incompetents that have allowed this legal farce to continue this past five years.

 

The problem with C Ms’ claim is that it is a scam - as you would have discovered if you had taken into account the verifiable facts of the matter, of which there is an abundance.

 

Did the Attorney General instruct you to provide him with cover, or have you decided, of your own volition, to play the role of ‘spin doctor’? Yes, C M may well be suffering from a variety of genuine mental illnesses and addictions, but he is also a very clever con artist, as has been apparent to icare and the Personal Injuries Commission for several years now.

 

The most egregious piece of disinformation to be found in your letter to the Attorney General concerns Ms. L’s signing of the contract with icare. You either don’t know of the circumstances surrounding this signing or have chosen to ignore them:

 

icare held a gun to Ms. L’s head, making threats to her if she did not sign within a very brief time-frame. This was at a time when she had been advised by a medical professional NOT to sign contracts of any kind whilst she was in no position, emotionally and psychologically, to do so. icare was well aware of this but held the gun to her head anyway – keen to extract whatever money it could from a 70 year old woman whose career the insurer had destroyed, along with her mental health.

 

Both icare and the Personal Injuries Commission have demonstrated in their dealings with Ms.L not just incompetence but also a callous disregard for the well-being of an employer who tried to help a mentally ill man in need; a paranoid addict with a track record of scamming down on his luck. In this he was aided and abetted by a psychiatrist who wrote the report about the alleged bullying of Mr. M that icare relied upon to be convinced that Ms. L bullied him so badly that he could never work again. This report was based on one conversation that Dr. Oldtree Clark had with his patient on the telephone; a patient he never met and whose decades-long medical records regarding his various mental illnesses and addictions were not available to him.

 

You have now carried water for C M, for icare and the Personal Injuries Commission and provided the Attorney General, in this undated letter of yours, with the Get-Out-of-Jail-Free card he can play if this multi-million-dollar scam ever becomes public knowledge.

 

When politicians behave as you have here, it is small wonder that so many in the community do not trust them; that many hold politicians in contempt.

 

You have not done your job and are not fit for purpose as a Minister for Industrial Relations and Work Health and Safety

 

yours sincerely

 

James Ricketson

cc Premier Chris Minns

Michael Daley, Attorney General

icare

Personal Injuries Commission

 

                                                                        ***

 

The Hon. Michael Daley, MP 

NSW Attorney General

GPO Box 5341
Sydney NSW 2001                                                               18th. December 2024

 

Dear Mr Daley

 

re xxxx Pty Ltd v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (icare)

 

I have written a dozen letters to Premier Chris Minns about this matter - the most recent of which was sent on 13th. December. 

 

Whilst I have received electronic acknowledgement of receipt of these, and requested a reply to all, replies have not been forthcoming. None of my questions have been answered.

 

It seems as though the Premier’s office does not believe that this matter is worthy of any attention.

 

I am a filmmaker who was in the process of producing a film about Ms. L (a world renowned xxxx artist) two years ago when this matter was brought to my attention.

 

At the time of my first letters to icare and the PIC, in the interests of transparency, I identified myself as such, and as both a journalist and a friend of Ms. L's - wearing three different hats. To these I must now add fourth - that of a human being with a commitment to justice and fair dealing requesting that the NSW government do whatever it can to prevent what could well be, in the absence of intervention, a tragic outcome to this matter..

 

The five years that this case has dragged on has taken an enormous toll on Ms. L's physical, mental and emotional lives. I have witnessed her transformation from a smiling, energetic and ever-optimistic cake artist to a sad shadow of her former self - no longer able to create, to earn a living, and robbed of her peace of mind  as she has been pursued and persecuted by icare on the basis of a fraudulent claim by Mr. M. 

 

This matter has turned Ms L's life into a nightmare, and it is one that I fear could lead to the worst possible ending.

 

I have asked many questions of icare, the Personal Injuries Commission (PIC) and of the Premier and need not repeat these. They are all on record. I will mention one only.

 

This dispute began with the allegation of bullying by Ms. L of C M back in 2019. No evidence has ever been provided that any such bullying occurred, whilst there is an abundance of evidence of Mr. M's bullying of Ms. L.

 

Despite the lack of evidence, icare, with the blessing of the PIC, has instructed Ms. L that she must pay icare $130,000 as a result of what the PIC itself admits are merely 'allegations' - an amount that will not even cover the legal fees accrued by icare this past five years.

 

If this order is enforced it will leave Ms. L with no choice but to sell her only asset - her home of 40 years.

 

Given Ms. L's current condition, this matter needs to be dealt with urgently by yourself, and not merely with a form letter of receipt of this letter.

 

Please intervene, Mr. Daley, by asking both icare and the PIC to provide you with evidence that Ms. L ever bullied Mr. M. When you discover, as you will, that there is no evidence, please do whatever needs to be done to bring this matter to a just conclusion.

 

Some of the many other questions I have asked can be found at:

 

http://jamesricketson.blogspot.com

 

 

yours sincerely

 

James Ricketson

cc icare

PIC

ICAC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Hon. Michael Daley, MP 

NSW Attorney General

GPO Box 5341
Sydney NSW 2001                                                               20th January 2025

 

Dear Mr Daley

 

re xxxxx Pty Ltd v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (icare)

 

Following on from my letter to you dated 18th. December 2024.

 

I have received neither an acknowledgement of its receipt, nor any response to it.

 

It seems as though the Office of the Attorney General, as with that of Premier Minns, does not believe that there is anything in this matter that is of concern - not the fact that we are now in the sixth year of what has been a financial and emotional disaster for Ms. L, and not the fact that no evidence has ever been produced that Ms. L bullied Mr. M.

 

I have uncovered some new aspects of this case that should be of serious concern to you, as Attorney General. You need to take a good hard look at the details of it with one question in mind: 'Has icare followed, adhered to, its own procedural rules and regulations?' I could help you with this, but I am sure (or hope) that there is someone in your office who can do their own research and discover why this case is nothing short of a legal farce.

 

I am certain if s/he were to deliver to you a report on what has happened here, what is continuing to happen, that you would do whatever you need to bring it to an end and, in the process, consider whether the key players in this legal farce are fit for purpose in the positions they hold in their respective organisations.

 

cheers

 

James Ricketson

from Sophie Cotsis Minister for Industrial Relations

 Hon Michael Daley MP

Attorney General office@daley.minister.nsw.gov.au

Dear Attorney-General,

 

OFFICIAL

 

Thank you for your correspondence from Mr James Ricketson. Mr Ricketson advocates on behalf of Ms L, owner of XXX Pty Ltd (XXX) who is involved in a workers compensation claim with her former employee, C M and icare.

 

Workers compensation insurance is mandatory for all employers unless they are exempt from holding a policy. By letter dated 8 September 2020, icare determined that XXX was not an employer exempt from holding a policy for the 2019-2020 financial year, ti was an employer that should have held a policy for this period and therefore, was considered an uninsured employer.

 

I understand that during the time that XXX was uninsured, a former employee made a workers compensation claim which was accepted by the Nominal Insurer (icare) under the Uninsured Liability Insurance Scheme. Section 145 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (the 1987 Act) sets out that the Nominal Insurer can serve a notice on an uninsured employer requesting them to reimburse the Insurance Fund the amount that it has paid in workers compensation benefits to a worker with an accepted workers compensation claim.

 

I understand that on 26 July 2022 icare served Sweet Art with a notice under section 145 of the 1987 Act seeking reimbursement of payments made from the Insurance Fund in respect of Mr Ms' claim. I am advised that Sweet Art made an application to the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) disputing liability for the reimbursement sought by care. A decision was made by the PIC on 5 October 2023 confirming that Sweet Art was required to reimburse icare the costs it had paid on Mr M's claim.

 

XXX and icare reached a settlement where Ms L would pay a set amount in monthly instalments to icare. I understand that Ms L is up to date with her payments and has not raised any further issues in relation to the settlement.

 

I acknowledge Mr Ricketson's ongoing advocacy for Ms L and XXX. The matter has been subject to formal litigation and determination has been achieved.

 

GPO Box 5341 Sydney NSW 2001 I P: (02) 7225 61 10 I W: nsw.gov.au/ministercotsis OFFICIAL

Our Reference: 00099/25

 OFFICIAL

The PIC as an independent statutory tribunal, being part of the system of courts and tribunals in NSW, is not under the control or direction of the Government. The PIC's Members are statutorily appointed decision makers who decide contested matters between parties. Each member is invested with decision making independence in that role. Determinations by the PIC are legally binding and final, and once determined, the matter generally cannot be pursued further. As such neither Ministers, Members of Parliament nor their departments can assist in having a determination made by the PIC overturned.

Yours sincerely

The Hon. Sophie Cotsis Minister for Industrial Relations

Minister for Work Health and Safety